Type One Energy has raised $87 million in new financing, a convertible note that positions the fusion startup for a planned $250 million Series B at a $900 million pre-money valuation. The fresh capital lifts total venture funding to more than $160 million and underscores growing investor conviction that magnetic-confinement fusion is nearing commercially relevant milestones. Backers include Breakthrough Energy Ventures, the climate-focused fund founded by Bill Gates, alongside strategic and energy investors from earlier rounds.
Why The Cash Matters For Fusion’s Next Mile
Convertible notes are a tactical bridge for deep-tech companies, allowing teams to accelerate R&D and supplier commitments while a larger equity round comes together. For Type One, the note helps de-risk long-lead hardware and validation campaigns tied to its stellarator design ahead of the Series B. In fusion, where a single component can set a program back months, capital timed to engineering gates is often as critical as the headline round itself.

The valuation target also signals confidence that the market is assigning premium value to differentiated fusion pathways. Investors have watched recent private milestones across the sector, yet grid-scale credibility hinges on sustained plasma control, manufacturable magnets, and plant-level integration—areas where stellarators historically offer advantages.
A Bet On Stellarators And Grid-Scale Reliability
Type One pursues a stellarator, a form of magnetic-confinement fusion that shapes magnetic fields into a twisted torus to confine superheated plasma. Unlike pulsed devices, stellarators are inherently steady-state, a feature that aligns with utility expectations for round-the-clock power. Decades of research at facilities such as Germany’s Wendelstein 7-X have demonstrated excellent plasma stability and long-duration operation, though none have yet produced electricity.
The key challenge has shifted from physics viability to engineering pragmatism: manufacturing complex, high-precision coils at scale, integrating high-temperature superconductors, and packaging heat exhaust and neutron shielding for a power plant. Type One’s program aims to compress that engineering risk with modern computational design, additive manufacturing techniques, and supply-chain partnerships that did not exist when earlier stellarators were built.
Utility Partnerships Over Direct Power Sales
In a notable go-to-market choice, Type One does not plan to own and operate plants. Instead, it will sell technology and core systems to utilities and power producers who build, own, and run the assets. That mirrors how large thermal power equipment has historically reached scale and could streamline deployment by leveraging utility capital structures, EPC partners, and existing grid interconnection expertise.
The strategy is already visible in a deal with the Tennessee Valley Authority to locate Type One’s first commercial plant, dubbed Infinity Two, at the former Bull Run Fossil Plant site. The proposed 350 megawatt facility would repower a retired coal footprint, taking advantage of transmission capacity and an industrial workforce, and target operation in the mid-2030s if milestones are met. For context, many fusion peers are initially targeting 50–100 megawatt-class units, making Infinity Two an ambitious swing at utility scale.

The Data Center Demand Backdrop Is Intensifying
Investor urgency around fusion is increasingly linked to the grid’s evolving load shape. Industry forecasts suggest data centers could draw nearly three times more electricity by 2035, driven by AI inference, training clusters, and cloud expansion. U.S. electricity demand growth, after years of flat consumption, is ticking up, with federal outlooks pointing to around 4% annual growth through the near term. The International Energy Agency and U.S. Energy Information Administration have both flagged fast-rising digital power loads as a structural driver.
Fusion’s promise—high-output, carbon-free generation with compact land use—slots into that picture. While wind, solar, and storage continue to expand, large dispatchable resources are scarce. Recent examples, like Helion Energy’s power purchase agreement with Microsoft, show that major buyers are willing to contract early for firm, clean capacity. Utilities, meanwhile, are reexamining portfolios to meet reliability standards under rising peak demand and electrification.
Competitive Landscape And Policy Tailwinds
Type One joins a crowded field spanning tokamaks, magneto-inertial, and Z-pinch concepts. Where tokamak-focused ventures emphasize high-field magnets and rapid iteration, stellarators trade pulsed operation for continuous stability, an attribute utilities often favor. Policy momentum is helping: the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has set a tailored regulatory pathway for fusion distinct from fission, reducing licensing uncertainty and clarifying safety requirements for near-term pilots.
Capital efficiency will still be decisive. Fusion companies that convert funds into verifiable engineering progress—validated magnet modules, repeatable coil fabrication, and credible heat exhaust designs—will command the best project finance terms and utility partnerships. Type One’s note-to-Series-B sequence is designed to show exactly that.
What To Watch As The Series B Round Takes Shape
Expect the company to detail magnet manufacturing milestones, component supply agreements, and site-readiness steps with TVA as it advances the Series B. Watch also for third-party validations, whether from national labs or established OEMs, that de-risk coil tolerances and thermal management—areas that historically determine whether stellarators scale from elegant physics machines to bankable power assets.
With more than $160 million raised to date and $87 million newly in hand, Type One is capitalizing on a rare alignment: maturing stellarator science, pressing grid demand, and clearer regulation. If its technology-first utility model holds, the company could become a supplier of choice for power producers looking to add firm, zero-carbon capacity in the next buildout cycle.