On January 20, the release of China’s newest AI model, DeepSeek R1, sent the markets and tech world into a spiral. This was primarily because its reasoning model performs on par with leading U.S. firm OpenAI’s similar o1 model, but was trained at a fraction of the cost. Influential tech investor Marc Andreessen called the breakthrough achieved by DeepSeek “AI’s Sputnik moment,” a sentiment echoed by other tech leaders and government officials who responded with securitized rhetoric surrounding China’s AI advancement and the threat it poses to the United States.
This meeting of minds between the tech leaders of Silicon Valley and the government officials of Washington – two groups which have often bumped heads – highlights the tech world’s adoption of the China-U.S. competition narrative. It marks a shift away from the previous position many tech CEOs had, which was largely in favor of open-source development of AI – perhaps an implication of their realization that an AI race with China is set to be much more profitable. Emphasizing a zero-sum competition with China looks set to drive support for and investment in the development of the American AI industry.
News that DeepSeek trained the R1 model while spending so little on graphic processing units (GPUs) sent the stock of Nvidia, the world’s largest chipmaker, plunging 17 percent in a single day, wiping out nearly $600 billion in market value in the process. Adding to the intrigue is the fact that DeepSeek was able to develop such a powerful model despite years of U.S. restrictions on the sale of high powered AI chips to China.
In a bipartisan display of concern, U.S. government officials were quick to respond to DeepSeek’s ascent to No.1 on the App Store. Representative John Moolenaar (R-MI), chair of the House Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), told reporters: “The U.S. cannot allow CCP models such as DeepSeek to risk our national security and leverage our technology to advance their AI ambitions.” Meanwhile, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) tweeted that this “Sputnik moment” for the United States is precisely why Congress needs to invest in AI.
U.S. President Donald Trump told the press: “The release of DeepSeek AI from a Chinese company should be a wake-up call for our industries that we need to be laser-focused on competing to win.” The Biden administration continuously ramped up export controls over AI and advanced semiconductors destined for China, and Trump is expected to continue enhancing these restrictions throughout his second term, though DeepSeek raises questions about how effective these controls really are.
As in Washington, the China-U.S. narrative has become a driving force behind AI development in Silicon Valley. But national security wasn’t always a core consideration among tech CEOs. OpenAI, the current market leader in models, started as an open-source research project enveloped in a nonprofit governance structure. When OpenAI was founded in 2015, the organization open-sourced models, weights, and research to stimulate the AI research field. With the release of GPT-2, the company stopped open-sourcing its work, citing safety concerns.
It is clear in the tech community that highlighting the risk that China’s AI development poses to U.S. national security gets the government’s attention. On Trump’s Inauguration Day, Scale AI took out a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal, claiming “America Must Win the AI War.” Scale has previously received Department of Defense (DOD) contracts of nearly $250 million dollars and has existing partnerships with the DOD’s Chief Digital and AI Office, U.S. Army, and Defense Innovation Unit; its leadership includes managing director Michael Kratsios, the fourth chief technology officer of the United States and nominated science adviser to Trump.
This rhetoric seems to be working. Technology CEOs have already won support for increased investment in AI to the order of $500 billion with the recently announced Stargate project, and there are likely to be more major AI infrastructure investments under the Trump administration. Analysts have referred to Stargate as the “Manhattan Project” of AI, again harkening back the kind of securitized rhetoric that has infused itself into the conversation about AI development. Trump has also removed regulations and pledged to boost energy production to make it much easier for companies to build data centers to train AI.
The launch of DeepSeek’s R1 seems to have shocked investors and technology CEOs into seeing Chinese technology as a true competitor to U.S. domestic innovation. Prior to DeepSeek’s launch, Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, saw the United States as two to three years ahead of China in terms of AI development, but he now sees DeepSeek’s rise as a “turning point” in global AI, showing China’s competitive ability in the AI space, and necessitating further U.S. investment in AI. Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn and an investor in OpenAI, stated that this development “demonstrates how immediate and strong the competitive talent from China is and why it’s crucial for America to continue to be at the forefront of AI development.”
Broadly, tech CEOs are gearing up to compete with China. Sam Altman, founder and CEO of OpenAI, promised that “better models” are coming soon, as well as a new “open source strategy.” Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Meta, is reportedly spinning up war rooms to deal with the influx of a more competitive open-source model. Dario Amodei, founder and CEO of Anthropic, argued that while DeepSeek’s advances are impressive, they emphasize the need for further and more intensive export controls against China to protect U.S. innovation.
These CEOs and their agendas have and will continue to have a large impact on Trump’s AI agenda. Present at his inaugural festivities was a line of tech billionaires, including Altman, Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai of Google, Jeff Bezos of Amazon, and Elon Musk of Tesla.
In his initial response to DeepSeek’s launch, Trump said that he planned to “unleash” tech companies so that the United States can “dominate the future like never before.” Between this language and the Stargate announcement, it’s clear that the tech world’s adoption of the China-U.S. narrative has worked to put AI development at the top of Trump’s national security agenda.
Government investment in and support of AI will be critical to the future of U.S. innovation, but it is important to contextualize some of the securitized rhetoric that is driving this agenda. Seeing Chinese AI advancement exclusively as a threat to the U.S. takes attention away from the potential of AI being weaponized by bad actors and rogue groups and undermines potential opportunities to work with China on bilateral and multilateral AI governance frameworks that will help ensure AI development is conducted responsibly and benefits all of humanity.
