No strings attached: A brief history of swimwear, from heavy skirts of linen linked to women’s drownings, to the skimpy two-piece named after a nuclear weapons site

Keira Knightly wearing a period white swimsuit and cap on a diving board

When the weather warms, cool water beckons. However, as we cast off our layers and slip into our swimsuits, we might perhaps spare a thought for our ancestors: it wasn’t so long ago that going for a dip entailed donning soon-to-be-sodden woollens, stockings (for women) and even shoes.

Few garments’ evolution reveals more about our social history and our changing relationship with our bodies than the swimsuit. ‘It really gives us an insight into themes such as modesty, display and which bodies are allowed into public spaces,’ notes fashion historian Amber Butchart, curator of ‘Splash! A Century of Swimming and Style’, a major exhibition currently running at London’s Design Museum. Divided into three sections — the pool, the lido and Nature — it charts the shifts in our love of swimming over the past 100 years alongside the clothing we have worn in the water, whether we’re splashing in the shallows or competing at the highest level. Highlights include a Union Flag-inspired swimsuit belonging to Paralympic champion Ellie Robinson and Olympic gold medallist Tom Daley’s Adidas trunks.

A group of young women in their bathing suits on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe, 1959.

(Image credit: Slim Aarons/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Wading a little further back to 18th- and 19th-century Britain reveals a nation populated by a majority of non-swimmers, who took to the water primarily to wash, cool off or revive themselves. ‘The salutary effects of sea-bathing… cannot be too strongly recommended,’ wrote Dorchester physician John Crane in 1795, extolling ‘the benign influence of the sea air’ and the water’s ‘purer’ vapour. Yet, the lack of suitable clothing made such exploits treacherous for women, particularly those who weighed down their hems with lead shot to prevent floating fabric compromising their respectability.

Men, on the other hand, would sometimes bathe nude or in their ‘drawers’, so it was unsurprising that bathing areas were strictly segregated and transgressions were taken seriously. According to an issue of the Yorkshire Post dated August 20, 1896, a gentleman caught teaching his sisters to swim was told by an inspector he had ‘no business to bathe with ladies’ and was issued with a court summons. Hindered by their clothing and discouraged from swimming, many women depended on the service of ‘dippers’, who would ease them into the sea from specially designed bathing machines: amphibious, horse-drawn changing rooms mounted on iron wheels.

Woman in a coral red swimsuit reclining on a wicker sun lounger

A couple sunbathing by the sea at Palm Beach, Florida, circa 1955. Around this time strapless suits, made from shirred fabric with feature necklines, were common.

(Image credit: Slim Aarons/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

It took a teenager in the 1870s to turn the tide on modesty laws that were increasingly being linked to women’s drownings. Performing feats of endurance in a whale tank in Westminster’s Royal Aquarium and completing a 20-mile swim in the Thames, Agnes Beckwith showed what was possible when heavy skirts of linen and serge were swapped for a fitted one-piece. Yet women would have to wait another 40 years until higher hemlines went mainstream. A key turning point was the introduction of women’s swimming at the Stockholm Olympics of 1912, which necessitated a streamlined silhouette and saw female competitors sporting a similar one-piece to their male counterparts. In the meantime, the ‘Princess Suit’ — a bulky, knee-length sailor-style ensemble with matching bloomers — bridged the transition, often paired with stockings pulled up to the knee and laced footwear fashioned from canvas and cork.

Source link

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *